[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090319201136.GB17094@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:11:36 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Thomas Hellström <thomas@...pmail.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core
changes
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries,
>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and
>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least!
>>
>
> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm
> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of
> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM
> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging
> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful.
>
> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards
> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs
> to be stripped.
Great, care to respin it and send it to me?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists