[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C2A7D2.3020306@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:15:14 -0700
From: Corbin Simpson <mostawesomedude@...il.com>
To: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Sindhudweep Sarkar <sindhudweep.sarkar@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core
changes
Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 12:03 -0400, Sindhudweep Sarkar wrote:
>> This might be the opinion of a completely non educated end user but it
>> seems that an intel specific drm and other bits (xorg, mesa) would be
>> somewhat of a maintenance waste.
>>
>> TI-OMAP 3xxx and a couple of other arm processors use similar SGX-5xx
>> graphics cores. IIRC arm is often little endian so perhaps a unified
>> driver would be easier in the long term.
>
> Long term a unified driver would be very nice to have and nobody
> disagrees with that. Things don't happen overnight and you have to take
> smaller steps to get there. This proposal is one step on a road that may
> lead to a driver for the TI part too. It will need someone in the ARM
> community to step up and write the ARM specific bits.
Nokia's written and open-sourced some related code for DRM.
My university is paying me to work on an ARM-based SoC handheld with an
SGX core, and I might be more into this later. (Y'know, once the device
is actually out the door.)
~ C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists