[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6a2187b0903182123s4371c67ep7a98f081d12b8e02@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:23:06 +0800
From: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> Rafael, can we close the case?
Not yet. I reran a few more times, and without patch, it'll fail sometimes.
Here's the 3 files. With patch, pass every time (so far).
nopatch.fail
nopatch.pass
passed.pass
> 1) You see no line like the one above in your log, but rather
> [ 736.047879] ieee80211 phy5: U iwl_bg_request_scan
> Start indirect scan.
> This would indicate a bug in the driver.
*** this is in nopatch.fail ***
2009-03-19T12:07:22.437578+08:00 boston kernel: ieee80211 phy0: U
iwl_bg_request_scan Start direct scan for 'sdg2088a88'
2009-03-19T12:07:24.337644+08:00 boston kernel: ieee80211 phy0: U
iwl_bg_request_scan Start indirect scan.
For the passing run, it's always "direct scan".
Thanks,
Jeff.
Download attachment "nopatch.fail" of type "application/octet-stream" (61509 bytes)
Download attachment "nopatch.pass" of type "application/octet-stream" (13006 bytes)
Download attachment "patched.pass" of type "application/octet-stream" (13004 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists