[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18882.50291.118201.148297@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:17:23 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] perf_counter: powerpc: clean up perc_counter_interrupt
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>
> > Nice cleanup, and thanks for updating powerpc too. With this, I think
> > we'll need to update the powerpc perf_counter_interrupt a bit: we
> > might as well use get_perf_counter_pending() instead of the wakeup
> > variable now. I'll send an extra patch once I have done some testing.
>
> This seems to work OK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Let's have a better patch description (my fault for not providing a
decent one in the first place):
perf_counter: powerpc: clean up perf_counter_interrupt
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
This updates the powerpc perf_counter_interrupt following on from the
"perf_counter: unify irq output code" patch. Since we now use the
generic perf_counter_output code, which sets the perf_counter_pending
flag directly, we no longer need the need_wakeup variable. This
removes need_wakeup and makes perf_counter_interrupt use
get_perf_counter_pending() instead.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists