[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <49C1E3B5.9050008@renesas.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:18:29 +0900
From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@...esas.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Linux-sh <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
maciej.sosnowski@...el.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: sh: Add support DMA-Engine driver for DMA of
SuperH
Hi, Dan.
Thank you for your comments.
2009/3/17 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@...esas.com> wrote:
>> This supports DMA-Engine driver for DMA of SuperH.
>> This supported all DMA channels, and it was tested in SH7722/SH7780.
>> This can not use with SH DMA API and can control this in Kconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@...esas.com>
>> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
>> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
>> Cc: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@...el.com>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> ---
>> arch/sh/drivers/dma/Kconfig | 12 +-
>> arch/sh/drivers/dma/Makefile | 3 +-
>> arch/sh/include/asm/dma-sh.h | 11 +
>> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 9 +
>> drivers/dma/Makefile | 2 +
>> drivers/dma/shdma.c | 743 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/dma/shdma.h | 65 ++++
>> 7 files changed, 840 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/dma/shdma.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/dma/shdma.h
>
> Hi,
>
> I have not finished a full review but one problem jumps out, the use
> of spin_lock_irqsave to protect against channel/descriptor
> manipulations. The highest level of protection that net_dma and
> async_tx assume is spin_lock_bh. It seems like the pieces of
> sh_dmae_interrupt() that touch the descriptor can be moved to the
> tasklet, then the locks can be downgraded.
Because a dmaengine core is not equivalent to the interrupt that is
severer than spin_lock_bh, is this to rearrange it in tasklet?
>
> Your other patch, to set the alignment in dmatest, makes me wonder if
> this engine can handle unaligned accesses? If it can not then set the
> DMA_PRIVATE capability bit at device registration time to prevent
> net_dma and other "public" clients from using these channels. Public
> clients assume that there are no alignment constraints.
>
I thought to add it because the patch wanted to measure the
transaction speed with the thing which
was not considered to be aligned address / data size.
Depending on a device using DMA, there is the thing forcing aligning
it of forwarded data.
DMAC of SH has a register appointing transfer data size.
I control it by the following functions.
+struct sh_dmae_chan {
+ dma_cookie_t completed_cookie; /* The maximum cookie completed */
+ spinlock_t desc_lock; /* Descriptor operation lock */
+ struct list_head ld_queue; /* Link descriptors queue */
+ struct dma_chan common; /* DMA common channel */
+ struct device *dev; /* Channel device */
+ struct resource reg; /* Resource for register */
+ struct tasklet_struct tasklet;
+ int id; /* Raw id of this channel */
+ char dev_id[16]; /* unique name per DMAC of channel */
+
+ /* Set chcr */
+ int (*set_chcr)(struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan, u32 regs);
This set up call from a device using dmaengine, and data appoint aligning it.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists