| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49C1E736.1000508@in.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:03:26 +0530 From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com> To: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de> CC: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, shaggy@...tin.ibm.com Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] [BUG/JFS/2.6.29-rc8] kernel BUG at fs/mpage.c:473! Christian Kujau wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Sachin Sant wrote: > >> autorun: reading command 85 /usr/local/autobench/scripts/autobench.dat >> autorun: run test fsstress -d $scratchdir -l $iterations: command read >> autorun: run test fsstress -d /mnt/tmp -l 1: was expanded >> 03/15/2009-19:36:37 processing command: (1) 'run test fsstress -d /mnt/tmp -l 1' >> > > How many iterations were really run to hit this BUG? When I specify "-l > 1", fsstress[0] comes back instantly (and no error of course)... > Sorry for the late reply. Somehow i missed this mail. Yeah with default option values fsstress completes in a jiffy. I generally invoke fsstress with 1000 operations per process (-n 1000) and 1000 processes (-p 1000). fsstress -d /mnt/tmp -l 1 -n 1000 -p 1000 Thanks -Sachin -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India --------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists