[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090320060128.GC6167@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:31:28 +0530
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about usage of RCU in the input layer
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 06:28:11AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> Hmm... point is to make linux boot as fast as possible, so ...
>
> Use a special variant of udelay() in offending drivers that make appropriate
> RCU call to increment quiescent state ?
It may not be safe to do this it is in a RCU read-side critical section.
Thanks
Dipankar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists