linux-kernel - Re: Question about usage of RCU in the input layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:31:28 +0530
From:	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about usage of RCU in the input layer

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 06:28:11AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> Hmm... point is to make linux boot as fast as possible, so ...
> 
> Use a special variant of udelay() in offending drivers that make appropriate
> RCU call to increment quiescent state ?

It may not be safe to do this it is in a RCU read-side critical section.

Thanks
Dipankar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/