[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090320083049.GA29471@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:30:49 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, roland@...hat.com, efault@....de,
rjw@...k.pl, jdike@...toit.com,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix uml slowness caused by ptrace preemption bug on
host
* Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 23:23 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch solves this by not scheduling on preempt_enable() after
> > > ptrace_stop() has woken up the tracer.
> >
> > Nice,.. however did you find this?
>
> Ftrace helped a lot, it's a really cool tool :). I had to patch it
> with this, otherwise the timestamps would be totally off:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index bd38c5c..557c2dd 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ u64 ring_buffer_time_stamp(int cpu)
>
> preempt_disable_notrace();
> /* shift to debug/test normalization and TIME_EXTENTS */
> - time = sched_clock() << DEBUG_SHIFT;
> + time = cpu_clock(cpu) << DEBUG_SHIFT;
> preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();
Btw., based on your earlier report, the same is now possible in the
latest tracing tree via:
echo 1 > /debug/tracing/options/global_clock
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists