| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:52:10 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Shentino <shentino@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: question about pt locking On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 01:16 -0700, Shentino wrote: > Just curious, but does a process effectively have a read-lock on its > page tables when it's in userland? No, page reclaim can fiddle with a running process' page tables concurrently. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists