linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090320002314.GA18781@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:23:14 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Thomas Hellström <thomas@...pmail.org>
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core
	changes

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:40:08PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>   
>>>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries,
>>>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented 
>>>> and
>>>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least!
>>>>         
>>> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm 
>>> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of
>>> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM
>>> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging
>>> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful.
>>>
>>> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards
>>> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs
>>> to be stripped.
>>>     
>>
>> Great, care to respin it and send it to me?
>>
> Greg,
> A clean TTM patch was sent to Intel with the other patches.
> I'm not sure why it got lost along the way?

As there seems to be an unknown number of people in the "intel chain"
that resulted in me finally getting these patches, I don't hold out much
hope that I'm going to be able to get more than what I already got from
them :(

So, any chance you could just resend it?  I'll be glad to trade it for a
beer at the next conference :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/