linux-kernel - Re: The Linux Staging tree, what it is and is not.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:01:46 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	daniel.krueger@...tec-electronic.com,
	Michael Olbrich <mol@...gutronix.de>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...gutronix.de>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: The Linux Staging tree, what it is and is not.

> However, I'm still not convinced that this is the right way to go. What
> you want to do for the main APIs is provide some nice userspace library
> API for your applications. Why not put the whole "stack" into userspace
> then and connect it to the kernel only via raw socket.

- Security
- Compartmentalisation
- Sharing the device/interconnect
- Real time prioritisation

and a few others.

> What do others think? Is it worth the effort to invent a proper objdict
> API for linux?

Objdict appears to be a legacy wart and can stay where it belongs I
suspect - you might need to have a objdict -> 21st century conversion
library for the afflicted. We don't put specialised COBOL support in the
kernel either we let user space figure out how to cope with the funnies.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/