[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090320100146.6599f671@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:01:46 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
daniel.krueger@...tec-electronic.com,
Michael Olbrich <mol@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...gutronix.de>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: The Linux Staging tree, what it is and is not.
> However, I'm still not convinced that this is the right way to go. What
> you want to do for the main APIs is provide some nice userspace library
> API for your applications. Why not put the whole "stack" into userspace
> then and connect it to the kernel only via raw socket.
- Security
- Compartmentalisation
- Sharing the device/interconnect
- Real time prioritisation
and a few others.
> What do others think? Is it worth the effort to invent a proper objdict
> API for linux?
Objdict appears to be a legacy wart and can stay where it belongs I
suspect - you might need to have a objdict -> 21st century conversion
library for the afflicted. We don't put specialised COBOL support in the
kernel either we let user space figure out how to cope with the funnies.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists