| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1237547751.16570.27.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:15:51 +0000 From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> To: "Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 10:47 +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote: > If it's possible, I'd like it go through the PCI tree because the ATS > depends on the SR-IOV. This dependency is not reflected in this v3 > series since the SR-IOV is not in-tree and I don't want to break the > build after people apply the ATS on their tree. In what way will it depend on SR-IOV? > So Dave, can I get an ack from you and let Jesse pull the IOMMU change > to his tree? Or let this ATS go to 2.6.31? Want to show the latest version of the patches which depend on SR-IOV, and I can ack them? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists