[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C37E28.2020304@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:29:44 -0400
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: ananth@...ibm.com
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -tip 7/9] tracing: kprobe-tracer plugin supports
arguments
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:10:40PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
>> +#if defined(__i386__)
>> +#define REGPARMS 3
>> +static unsigned long fetch_argument(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long n = (unsigned long)data;
>> + if (n > REGPARMS) {
>> + /*
>> + * The typical case: arg n is on the stack.
>> + * stack[0] = return address
>> + */
>> + return fetch_stack(regs, (void *)(n - REGPARMS));
>> + } else {
>> + switch (n) {
>> + case 1: return regs->ax;
>> + case 2: return regs->dx;
>> + case 3: return regs->cx;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +#elif define(__x86_64__)
>
> #elif defined(__x86_64__)
Ahh, yes.
>
>> +#define REGPARMS 6
>> +static unsigned long fetch_argument(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long n = (unsigned long)data;
>> + if (n > REGPARMS) {
>> + /*
>> + * The typical case: arg n is on the stack.
>> + * stack[0] = return address
>> + */
>> + return fetch_stack(regs, (void *)(n - REGPARMS));
>> + } else {
>> + switch (n) {
>> + case 1: return regs->di;
>> + case 2: return regs->si;
>> + case 3: return regs->dx;
>> + case 4: return regs->cx;
>> + case 5: return regs->r8;
>> + case 6: return regs->r9;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static unsigned long fetch_argument(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
>> +{
>> + return fetch_stack(regs, data);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> As mentioned in another email, if we can generalize something similar to
> syscall_get_arguments, this can be made to work for many !x86 archs.
> AFAICS the calling conventions mandated by the ABI are followed at
> syscall time, isn't it?
No, function calling conventions depend on gcc(i386)/ABI specification
(x86-64). And on i386, this just works on most of functions which are
compiled with -mregparm=3, and without asmlinkage(for asmlinkage functions,
all arguments are passed over stack).
So, it just provides a "user-friendly" interface :) , not a strict defined
interface.
Thanks,
>
> Ananth
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists