[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090320130401.GK30407@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:04:01 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] blktrace: don't increase blk_probes_ref if failed
to setup blk trace
Em Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:48:47AM +0800, Li Zefan escreveu:
> do_blk_trace_setup() may return EBUSY, but the current code doesn't
> decrease blk_probes_ref in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Looks valid,
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists