[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903192008450.13615@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -tip 0/9] tracing: kprobe-based event tracer
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a series of patches which introduce a proof-of concept of
> kprobe-based event tracer to ftrace. I think that we could port some
> tracing features from systemtap on this vehicle.
> This can be applied on the linux-2.6-tip tree.
>
> This patchset includes following changes:
> - Add kprobe-tracer plugin
> - Add kernel_trap_sp() on x86, ia64, power, s390, arm which are
> ported from systemtap runtime.
> - Add module_*probe api for repawning/removing kprobes when target
> module is coming/going.
>
> It's still not unclear that the last module_*probe would better be
> provided as APIs or just embed it in trace_kprobe.c.
>
> Future items:
> - Use binary print.
> - Add kernel_trap_sp() on other archs.
> - Support symbol-based memory fetching (for global variables)
> - Support primitive types(long, ulong, int, uint, etc) for args.
> - Support indirect memory fetch from register etc.
> - Check insertion point safety by using instruction decoder.
>
> kprobe-based event tracer
> ---------------------------
>
> This tracer is similar to the events tracer which is based on Tracepoint
> infrastructure. Instead of Tracepoint, this tracer is based on kprobes(kprobe
> and kretprobe). It probes anywhere where kprobes can probe(this means, all
> functions body except for __kprobes functions).
>
> Unlike the function tracer, this tracer can probe instructions inside of
> kernel functions. It allows you to check which instruction has been executed.
>
> Unlike the Tracepoint based events tracer, this tracer can add new probe points
> on the fly.
>
> Similar to the events tracer, this tracer doesn't need to be activated via
> current_tracer, instead of that, just set probe points via
> /debug/tracing/kprobe_probes.
>
> Synopsis of kprobe_probes:
> p SYMBOL[+offs|-offs]|MEMADDR [FETCHARGS] : set a probe
> r SYMBOL[+0] [FETCHARGS] : set a return probe
>
> FETCHARGS:
> rN : Fetch Nth register (N >= 0)
> sN : Fetch Nth entry of stack (N >= 0)
> mADDR : Fetch memory at ADDR (ADDR should be in kernel)
> aN : Fetch function argument. (N >= 1)(*)
> rv : Fetch return value.(**)
> rp : Fetch return address.(**)
>
> (*) aN may not correct on asmlinkaged functions and at function body.
> (**) only for return probe.
>
> E.g.
> echo p do_sys_open a1 a2 a3 a4 > /debug/tracing/kprobe_probes
>
> This sets a kprobe on the top of do_sys_open() function with recording
> 1st to 3rd arguments.
Do you mean 1st to 4th?
>
> echo r do_sys_open rv rp >> /debug/tracing/kprobe_probes
>
> This sets a kretprobe on the return point of do_sys_open() function with
> recording return value and return address.
>
> echo > /debug/tracing/kprobe_probes
>
> This clears all probe points. and you can see the traced information via
> /debug/tracing/trace.
>
> echo /debug/tracing/trace
> # tracer: nop
> #
> # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> # | | | | |
> <...>-2376 [001] 262.389131: do_sys_open: @do_sys_open+0 0xffffff9c 0x98db83e 0x8880 0x0
> <...>-2376 [001] 262.391166: sys_open: <-do_sys_open+0 0x5 0xc06e8ebb
> <...>-2376 [001] 264.384876: do_sys_open: @do_sys_open+0 0xffffff9c 0x98db83e 0x8880 0x0
> <...>-2376 [001] 264.386880: sys_open: <-do_sys_open+0 0x5 0xc06e8ebb
> <...>-2084 [001] 265.380330: do_sys_open: @do_sys_open+0 0xffffff9c 0x804be3e 0x0 0x1b6
> <...>-2084 [001] 265.380399: sys_open: <-do_sys_open+0 0x3 0xc06e8ebb
>
> @SYMBOL means that kernel hits a probe, and <-SYMBOL means kernel returns
> from SYMBOL(e.g. "sysenter_do_call: <-sys_open+0" means kernel returns from
> sys_open to sysenter_do_call).
>
This looks cool. I'll have to start playing with it.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists