[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237577688.4667.68.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:34:48 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: cpu hotplug and lockdep (was: Re: [tip:core/ipi] generic-ipi:
eliminate spurious pointlessWARN_ON()s)
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 19:52 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 19:24 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Now back to my regularly scheduled hotunplug challenges starting
> > > with getting lockdep to warn about the dead locks.
>
> http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/cpu-hotplug/
>
> The recursive read code needs more work..
You'll find some network softirq inversion 'fixes' there, but those are
false, (soft)irq recursion isn't a problem for recursive read locks, but
of course only as long as writes (and thereby all nesting exclusive
locks) are irq-safe so as to not create write in read deadlocks.
Just never gotten around to actually implementing that, ego also offered
to look at that at one point, but I guess he didn't get around to it
either ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists