[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C3F1EE.90903@vflare.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:13:42 +0530
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: cl@...ux-foundation.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xvmalloc memory allocator
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 3/20/2009, "Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>> I think, with a bit playing around with interfaces, it can be turned into
>>> general purpose allocator (this will most probably lack highmem support).
>> Then it would need to implement the SLAB api (see include/linux/slab.h).
>> Thus we are getting slab allocator #5.
>
> I do not see the point in that. As I suggested earlier, you should
> probably just move this into drivers/block/ and make it a private
> compcache allocator.
>
Your wish. But, really, we should not dismiss an O(1) allocator with great
space-efficiency so easily. I think it will be great at least for embedded
devices (its counterpart, SLOB is simply funny).
Just to add to this, Xen recently included a variant of TLSF allocator
which was used in earlier versions of compcache. TLSF is allocator on
which xvmalloc is based.
http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?file/0477f9061c8a/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
(Though I do not know which parts of xen depend on this allocator).
and xvmalloc vs tlsf arguments are here:
http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/xvMalloc
tlsf:
http://rtportal.upv.es/rtmalloc/
Anyways, I will move it to drivers/block.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists