[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3934.1237515949@jrobl>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:25:49 +0900
From: hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Aufs2 #3 2/2] split 'xino' entry under sysfs
Greg KH:
> > +Description:
> > + It shows the consumed blocks by xib (External Inode Number
> > + Bitmap), its block size and file size.
> > + When the aufs mount option 'noxino' is specified, it
> > + will be empty. About XINO files, see
> > + Documentation/filesystems/aufs/aufs.5 in detail.
>
> Sysfs files are one value per file. This violates that rule.
Current print format is
"%llux%lu %lld\n", st->blocks, st->blksize, (long long)st->size
Do you mean this has three values and violates the rule?
And aufs should create three entries such like xib/blocks, xib/blksize
and xib/size?
If I change it "<blocks>x<blksize>", is it still violation?
> Are all of these things something that a "normal" user would care about?
> or are they development / debugging things?
Normal users want to care them, I guess.
Since XINO files grow only, some heavy users had met ENOSPC
actually. Currently aufs supports automatic truncation for XINO files in
tmpfs only.
> And why are you using seq_file for a sysfs file? That's not allowed,
> and a sure sign you are doing something wrong, please remove all of
> that.
I just wanted to set limit its size to PAGE_SIZE to print the absolute
path. Is there another better approach?
Thank you for reviewing
J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists