[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C53D00.9060008@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:16:16 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ilya Yanok <yanok@...raft.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"Sosnowski, Maciej" <maciej.sosnowski@...el.com>,
Yuri Tikhonov <yur@...raft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] async_tx: add support for asynchronous GF multiplication
Ilya Yanok wrote:
>>>
>> For any n (which would mean any GF field)? In that case, that is
>> generic scalar-vector multiplication...
>>
>
> Ok. I think I got it. Vectors are things that depend on position inside
> buffer and scalars are things that don't, am I right? In that sense we
> don't have any vector-vector multiplication. Both async_gen_syndrome()
> and async_pq() use constant coefficients. So I don't really understand
> the problem here.
>
Perhaps the interface is just too confusing (in which case it needs to
at least be better documented), but at least the synchronous simulation
code looked like it was doing a vector-vector multiply.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists