[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090321024639.GB21064@hallyn.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:46:39 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] introduce user_ns inheritance in user-sched
Quoting Peter Zijlstra (peterz@...radead.org):
> On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 16:16 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > In a kernel compiled with CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y, cpu shares are
> > allocated according to uid. Shares are specifiable under
> > /sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/
> >
> > In a kernel compiled with CONFIG_USER_NS=y, clone(2) with the
> > CLONE_NEWUSER flag creates a new user namespace, and the newly
> > cloned task will belong to uid 0 in the new user namespace.
>
> We seem to be adding more and more stuff for USER_SCHED, is anybody
> actually using that cruft?
>
> How far along with cgroups are we to fully simulate that behaviour?
>
> I think if we have a capable cgroup based replacement for USER_SCHED we
> should axe it from the kernel, would save lots of code...
I didn't realize that was the plan. Using PAM to move users
around cgroups? If so, then yeah that would simplify quite a bit
of code. Won't catch all setuid()s of course - I don't know
who uses USER_SCHED and if that would matter.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists