[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090321223759.GA22770@x200.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:37:59 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, utrace-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] utrace-based ftrace "process" engine, v2
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:20:30PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:02:59PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The thing is, utrace crashes in Fedora have dominated kerneloops.org
> > > for many months [...]
> >
> > .. and dammit, I agree 100%. If utrace really shows up in _any_ way on
> > kerneloops.org, then I think THE ENTIRE DISCUSSION in this thread is moot.
>
> There was a short span of time during last fall, when Roland was on
> vacation. That bug (in 2.6.26.3) was fixed during the kernel summit.
> So this is a six-month obsolete grievance.
struct task_struct::utrace became embedded struct. This is good and
should remove quite a few of utrace bugs. Better late than never.
However, "rewrite-ptrace-via-utrace" patch was omitted, so almost noone
can easily see by how much situation improved.
I see this patch was dropped in Fedora.
Will ptrace(2) will be rewritten through utrace?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists