lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903221826520.17976@blonde.anvils>
Date:	Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:33:04 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
cc:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH next] sysfs: fix some bin_vm_ops errors

Commit 86c9508eb1c0ce5aa07b5cf1d36b60c54efc3d7a
"sysfs: don't block indefinitely for unmapped files" in linux-next
crashes the PowerMac G5 when X starts up.  It's caught out by the way
powerpc's pci_mmap of legacy_mem uses shmem_zero_setup(), substituting
a new vma->vm_file whose private_data no longer points to the bin_buffer
(substitution done because some versions of X crash if that mmap fails).

The fix to this is straightforward: the original vm_file is fput() in
that case, so this mmap won't block sysfs at all, so just don't switch
over to bin_vm_ops if vm_file has changed.

But more fixes made before realizing that was the problem:-

It should not be an error if bin_page_mkwrite() finds no underlying
page_mkwrite().

Check that a file already mmap'ed has the same underlying vm_ops
_before_ pointing vma->vm_ops at bin_vm_ops.

If the file being mmap'ed is a shmem/tmpfs file, don't fail the mmap
on CONFIG_NUMA=y, just because that has a set_policy and get_policy.
They probably won't be called, and it's not a disaster if they don't
work on sysfs.  vm_ops->migrate?  I couldn't find any example.  Just
delete CONFIG_NUMA tests, easy enough to add stubs later if required.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
---
I have only tested that X now starts up fine on the G5: I don't think
I've messed up the intent of your patch, but not tested it still works.

 fs/sysfs/bin.c |   18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- 2.6.29-rc8-next/fs/sysfs/bin.c	2009-03-20 12:41:45.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/fs/sysfs/bin.c	2009-03-21 18:01:26.000000000 +0000
@@ -241,9 +241,12 @@ static int bin_page_mkwrite(struct vm_ar
 	struct sysfs_dirent *attr_sd = file->f_path.dentry->d_fsdata;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!bb->vm_ops || !bb->vm_ops->page_mkwrite)
+	if (!bb->vm_ops)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (!bb->vm_ops->page_mkwrite)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!sysfs_get_active_two(attr_sd))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -287,7 +290,6 @@ static int mmap(struct file *file, struc
 	struct sysfs_dirent *attr_sd = file->f_path.dentry->d_fsdata;
 	struct bin_attribute *attr = attr_sd->s_bin_attr.bin_attr;
 	struct kobject *kobj = attr_sd->s_parent->s_dir.kobj;
-	struct vm_operations_struct *vm_ops;
 	int rc;
 
 	mutex_lock(&bb->mutex);
@@ -302,24 +304,20 @@ static int mmap(struct file *file, struc
 		goto out_put;
 
 	rc = attr->mmap(kobj, attr, vma);
-	vm_ops = vma->vm_ops;
-	vma->vm_ops = &bin_vm_ops;
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_put;
 
-	rc = -EINVAL;
-	if (bb->mmapped && bb->vm_ops != vma->vm_ops)
+	if (vma->vm_file != file)
 		goto out_put;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 	rc = -EINVAL;
-	if (vm_ops && ((vm_ops->set_policy || vm_ops->get_policy || vm_ops->migrate)))
+	if (bb->mmapped && bb->vm_ops != vma->vm_ops)
 		goto out_put;
-#endif
 
 	rc = 0;
 	bb->mmapped = 1;
-	bb->vm_ops = vm_ops;
+	bb->vm_ops = vma->vm_ops;
+	vma->vm_ops = &bin_vm_ops;
 out_put:
 	sysfs_put_active_two(attr_sd);
 out_unlock:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ