[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090322204156.GA27113@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:41:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] updates for tip/tracing/ftrace
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> found another, unrelated lockup with the event tracer:
>
> europe:/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new> cat enable
> 0
> europe:/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new> echo 1 > enable
> europe:/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new> sync
> europe:/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new> cat
> ../../../trace_pipe
> <...>-2870 [000] 688.730160: sched_wakeup_new: task
> bash:2898 [120] success=1
> <...>-2870 [001] 689.945375: sched_wakeup_new: task
> bash:2899 [120] success=1
>
> [hard lockup]
ok, tracked it down - it's the new trace_wake_up() from within
wake_up_new_task() => bad idea.
I think this was introduced via:
6eaaa5d: tracing/core: use appropriate waiting on trace_pipe
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists