linux-kernel - Re: Question about usage of RCU in the input layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090322161637.056a43c5@infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:16:37 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about usage of RCU in the input layer

On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:03:31 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:44:33PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:52:12 -0700
> > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:46:32PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:53:24 -0700
> > > > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > > How many synchronize_rcu() calls are you seeing on the
> > > > > > > boot path?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I see 20 that hit the above code path (eg ones that wait)
> > > > > > until userspace starts.
> > > > > 
> > > > > So with well-behaved readers, the full sequence would be worth
> > > > > something like 50-60 milliseconds.
> > > > 
> > > > yeah it's about 10% if the total kernel boot time.. so it does
> > > > start to matter
> > > 
> > > Half-second boot, eh?  That would indeed be impressive.
> > 
> > half a second until calling init.. that's what I have today (with
> > all drivers built in).. nothing really special needed for it
> > (well a few small patches that are pending for 2.6.30 ;-)
> 
> I thought the measurement was until the desktop was running with no
> more disk activity.  ;-)

yeah that's like 2 seconds after that ;)

> 
> But in any case, I will see what I can do about speeding up
> synchronize_rcu().  I will likely start with TREE_RCU, and I may need
> some sort of indication that boot is in progress.

system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING is not a very elegant test but it works



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/