[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090323084254.GA1685@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:42:54 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: keep pages from unevictable mappings off the LRU lists
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:21:36AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Hmm,,
> >
> > This patch is another thing unlike previous series patches.
> > Firstly, It looked good to me.
> >
> > I think add_to_page_cache_lru have to become a fast path.
> > But, how often would ramfs and shmem function be called ?
> >
> > I have a concern for this patch to add another burden.
> > so, we need any numbers for getting pros and cons.
> >
> > Any thoughts ?
>
> this is the just reason why current code don't call add_page_to_unevictable_list().
> add_page_to_unevictable_list() don't use pagevec. it is needed for avoiding race.
>
> then, if readahead path (i.e. add_to_page_cache_lru()) use add_page_to_unevictable_list(),
> it can cause zone->lru_lock contention storm.
How is it different then shrink_page_list()? If readahead put a
contiguous chunk of unevictable pages to the file lru, then
shrink_page_list() will as well call add_page_to_unevictable_list() in
a loop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists