linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] add rt_tgsigqueueinfo syscall [RESEND]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903231213180.29264@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:14:59 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
cc:	mtk.manpages@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] add rt_tgsigqueueinfo syscall [RESEND]

Roland,

On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote:

> I don't see any rationale for rt_tgsigqueueinfo and rt_sigqueueinfo to
> differ in their treatment of si_pid/si_uid (whatever that is).  It just
> seems like common sense that they would match.
> 
> Oleg and/or Sukadev have some patches floating around (maybe all in -mm?)
> that relate to setting those.

You mean having the same logic as we have in {t,tg,}kill syscalls for
rt_sigqueueinfo as well ?

Is there anything else which stands in the way of getting the
rt_tgsigqueueinfo interface merged ?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/