[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903230141370.10796@blonde.anvils>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:44:56 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] sysfs: fix some bin_vm_ops errors
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 18:33 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Commit 86c9508eb1c0ce5aa07b5cf1d36b60c54efc3d7a
> > "sysfs: don't block indefinitely for unmapped files" in linux-next
> > crashes the PowerMac G5 when X starts up. It's caught out by the way
> > powerpc's pci_mmap of legacy_mem uses shmem_zero_setup(), substituting
> > a new vma->vm_file whose private_data no longer points to the bin_buffer
> > (substitution done because some versions of X crash if that mmap fails).
> >
> > The fix to this is straightforward: the original vm_file is fput() in
> > that case, so this mmap won't block sysfs at all, so just don't switch
> > over to bin_vm_ops if vm_file has changed.
>
> Looks good, though we should probably also add a comment to your code
> to make it clear why the test is here.
Right, done.
>
> The fix should probably go into .29...
No, this is just a linux-next or mmotm thing. (I probably misled
you by quoting the commit id: though helpful, that is confusing.)
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists