[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Llk5q-0000kd-IR@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:21:30 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: serue@...ibm.com
CC: bfields@...ldses.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: unprivileged mounts vs. rmdir (was: VFS, NFS security bug? ...)
[CCs trimmed]
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting J. Bruce Fields (bfields@...ldses.org):
> > special privilege, so don't consult filesystem permissions (do I have
> > that right? What happened to the attempt to allow ordinary users to
> > mount?).
>
> Well, they keep getting stalled because we don't have a good answer for
> what to do about the fact that an unprivileged user can make trees
> undeletable by pinning them with mounts. (Miklos and Eric cc'd in case
> I didn't explain that well enough).
That's correct.
The best answer I can come up with is to allow rmdir/unlink to
automatically umount trees from their respective dentries. Obviously
this can't be done for regular (privileged) mounts, which must keep
returning EBUSY in such situations.
But for unprivileged mounts I can't see any fundamental issue with
such an approach.
Does anyone see a problem with this? Is there a better solution?
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists