[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090323145921.GC15416@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:59:21 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Cleanup and optimise the page allocator V5
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:30:26AM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > This came up again. There was some evidence when it was introduced that
> > it worked and micro-benchmarks can show it to be of some use. It's
> > not-obvious-enough that I'd be wary of deleting it.
>
> Certainly there is some minimal benefit. But maybe that benefit will
> vanish if you drop the doubly linked list?
>
Extremely difficult to tell. It only makes a difference if you are not
over a cache-line boundary using a singly linked list. If the structure
is within a cache-line boundary with either single or double linked
lists, it probably makes no measurable difference.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists