[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1LllkK-0000zF-1h@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:07:24 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: mingo@...e.hu, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
roland@...hat.com, efault@....de, rjw@...k.pl, jdike@...toit.com,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: [patch] fix ptrace slowness
This one incorporates comments from Oleg and Ingo. Please apply to
2.6.29 and 2.6.2[78]-stable trees.
Thanks,
Miklos
----
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
This patch fixes bug #12208:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
This turned out to be not a scheduler regression, but an already
existing problem in ptrace being triggered by subtle scheduler
changes.
The problem is this:
- task A is ptracing task B
- task B stops on a trace event
- task A is woken up and preempts task B
- task A calls ptrace on task B, which does ptrace_check_attach()
- this calls wait_task_inactive(), which sees that task B is still on the runq
- task A goes to sleep for a jiffy
- ...
Since UML does lots of the above sequences, those jiffies quickly add
up to make it slow as hell.
This patch solves this by not rescheduling in read_unlock() after
ptrace_stop() has woken up the tracer.
Thanks to Oleg Nesterov and Ingo Molnar for the feedback.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
CC: stable@...nel.org
---
kernel/signal.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
Index: linux.git/kernel/signal.c
===================================================================
--- linux.git.orig/kernel/signal.c 2009-03-20 09:41:04.000000000 +0100
+++ linux.git/kernel/signal.c 2009-03-23 15:40:57.000000000 +0100
@@ -1575,7 +1575,15 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, i
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
if (may_ptrace_stop()) {
do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_TRAPPED);
+ /*
+ * Don't want to allow preemption here, because
+ * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive.
+ *
+ * XXX: implement read_unlock_no_resched().
+ */
+ preempt_disable();
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ preempt_enable_no_resched();
schedule();
} else {
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists