linux-kernel - Re: Test some kernel feature without recompile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3e8340490903222021q24fc95e5hf1f216c69582954@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:21:07 -0400
From:	Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>
To:	Dragoslav Zaric <dragoslav.zaric.kd@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Test some kernel feature without recompile

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Dragoslav Zaric
<dragoslav.zaric.kd@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know when you work on some kernel module, you can change code and load
> module again and test it, but what if you change some built in kernel
> .c file, why
> would I need to recompile whole kernel just to see what happens if I change one
> .c file ??
>
> Why can I just compile one changed .c file and copy it where compiled version of
> that file reside inside kernel tree? Or maybe there is some image info embedded
> inside compiled files, so that file must belong to specific image from
> which it is
> installed ?

ksplice can do this in some limited cases: http://www.ksplice.com/example-update

Obviously, changes which affect the structure of kernel datastructures
are more difficult to accomplish...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/