[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090323155303.GA5528@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:53:03 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, roland@...hat.com, efault@....de,
rjw@...k.pl, jdike@...toit.com,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix ptrace slowness
On 03/23, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> There's an alternative patch
> below. Would you mind to give it a test? Chances are that it will
> make UML even faster than your fix.
>
> Ingo
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 3e827b8..2d60f23 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2119,7 +2119,8 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state)
> * yield - it could be a while.
> */
> if (unlikely(on_rq)) {
> - schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> + cpu_relax();
> + cond_resched();
What if the caller is a realtime task? We can spin "forever", no?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists