linux-kernel - Re: AMD Quad core - PCI-DMA: Out of IOMMU space on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43e72e890903231009m6416f07brafe3088eae63abc5@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:09:28 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, joerg.roedel@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: AMD Quad core - PCI-DMA: Out of IOMMU space on > 4 GB RAM

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:15:37 -0700
>> "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've run into "PCI-DMA: Out of IOMMU space" messages after loading and
>>> unloading a module 30 times. The interesting thing is this only
>>> happens if I have > 4 GB of memory. The box this occurs has AMD Phenom
>>> quad core CPU so I take it a harware IOMMU is being used. Below are
>>> example relevant messages with > 4 GB and then < 4 GB of memory. The
>>> driver I tested this with was ath9k. It could be an issue perhaps with
>>> ath9k but I am unable to find an issue in our probe/removal.
>>>
>>> Could this be an issue with the AMD IOMMU used? Or is it more likely a
>>> driver issue?
>>
>> ath9k wants DMA_32BIT_MASK, right? If so, GART IOMMU does nothing on a
>> system with < 4GB memory since ath9k can access to all the memory
>> addresses directly. With >4GB memory, GART needs to remap an address
>> higher than 4GB because ath9k wants DMA_32BIT_MASK.
>>
>> From a quick look, ath9k doesn't call pci_unmap_single for rx
>> buffers. Though I might be wrong because I don't know anything about
>> the driver.
>
> You seem to be right actually, we were calling pci_unmap_single() for
> rx buffers on the RX tasklet but never for the simple case of removing
> the module. Will test it out in a bit.

That was it, thanks.. will propagate the patch.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/