[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903231446020.3578@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:46:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/function-graph-tracer: don't profile branches
on graph tracer
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Impact: fix slow tracing
>
> The core kernel tracing is protected against soft branch profiling, but
> not the x86 ftrace arch part. Let's fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> index 599e9a7..8d9b3f9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_rtc.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_paravirt-spinlocks.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_ftrace.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_early_printk.o = -pg
> +CFLAGS_ftrace.o += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> endif
>
Actually, I prefer not to do this. I do use the branch profiling on
ftrace, to see where the hot paths are.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists