linux-kernel - Re: Error: freeing invalid memtype

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090323194828.GC29478@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:48:28 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Error: freeing invalid memtype


* Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 04:05:48PM -0700, Kevin Winchester wrote:
> > Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> > > Kevin,
> > > 
> > > Can you please send me the output of
> > > # cat /debug/x86/pat_memtype_list
> > > 
> > > (with debugfs mounted at /debug) as soon as you login into X and also
> > > when you start seeing these errors with etracer and glxinfo.
> > > 
> > 
> > Here is the output before attempting to run glxinfo:
> > : :
> > : :
> > 
> > Does that help track down the problem?  I am about to try disabling PAT
> > in my config to see if that fixes things.
> > 
> 
> Can you please try the patch below and let me whether it helps.
> 
> Thanks,
> Venki
> 
> x86, PAT: Change vma prot in pci_mmap to reflect inherited prot
>     
> While looking at the issue in the thread
> http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=123606627824556&w=2
> noticed a bug in pci PAT code and memory type setting.
>     
> pci mmap code did not set the proper protection in vma, when it
> inherited protection in reserve_memtype. This bug only affects
> the case where there exists a WC mapping before X does an mmap
> with /proc or /sys pci interface. This will cause X userlevel
> mmap from /proc or /sysfs to fail on fork.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> index 5ead808..f234a37 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,9 @@ int pci_mmap_page_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  		flags = new_flags;
> +		vma->vm_page_prot = __pgprot(
> +			(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & ~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK) |
> +			flags);

If it solves the problem it will be for -stable too, right?

It could be done a bit cleaner i think: is the ~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK 
really needed? Does ->vm_page_prot ever have page frame bits set?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/