linux-kernel - Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: cleanup patches 20090322

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090323211621.GA15364@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:16:21 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: cleanup patches 20090322

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 07:40:02AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009 20:15:06 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:45 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Monday 23 March 2009 07:22:56 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > >       x86: e820.h fix various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.c
> > > 
> > > Wouldn't fixing the users be better than changing the header?  Esp. since
> > > it could well now cause similar warnings in userspace programs.
> ...
> > Is this OK, or should I go more further:
> > 
> > From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
> > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:13:01 +0530
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86: e820 fix various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.c
> > 
> > Impact: cleanup
> > 
> > This fixed various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.c:
> > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
> 
> This looks fine (assuming it fixes the warnings).
> 
> In future it would be nice to explicitly mention that these are "sparse"
> warnings, not actual "signedness issues" ("Impact: cleanup" implies that,
> but the subject makes it sound like there's a pressing problem).

As long as this goes into the body of the changelog - yes.
We do not want those overly long subject lines.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/