[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C8A823.6020809@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:30:11 +0100
From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@...itsu-siemens.com>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
CC: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Improving IPMI performance under load
Hi Corey,
yesterday I posted some results about the IPMI performance under CPU
load, which can be up to 25 times slower than in an idle system. I think
it might be worthwhile to try to improve that behavior as well.
I made a variation of my patch which introduces a second parameter
(kipmid_min_busy) that causes kipmid not to call schedule() for a
certain amount of time. Thus if there's IPMI traffic pending, kipmid
will busy-loop for kipmid_min_busy seconds, then starting to schedule()
in each loop as it does now, and finally go to sleep when
kipmid_max_busy is reached. At the same time, I changed the nice value
of kipmid from 19 to 0.
With this patch and e.g. min_busy=100 and max_busy=200, there is no
noticeable difference any more between IPMI performance with and without
CPU load.
The patch + results still need cleanup, therefore I am not sending it
right now. Just wanted to hear what you think.
Martin
--
Martin Wilck
PRIMERGY System Software Engineer
FSC IP ESP DEV 6
Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH
Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1
33106 Paderborn
Germany
Tel: ++49 5251 525 2796
Fax: ++49 5251 525 2820
Email: mailto:martin.wilck@...itsu-siemens.com
Internet: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com
Company Details: http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists