[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C84060.6010903@mnementh.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:07:28 +0000
From: Ian Molton <ian@...menth.co.uk>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
CC: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
drzeus-wbsd@...eus.cx, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] tmio_mmc: Minor fixes and cnf/irq changes
Magnus Damm wrote:
> Thanks for your help. I was hoping on getting patch 3 and 4 included
> in 2.6.30 as well if possible. I suspect that i have to rework them a
> bit first though. That's no problem. Just let me know how you guys
> prefer things and i'll resend.
Can you clarify how your platform actually controls the MMC clock? does
it at all?
what is your platform?
Ideally, the MMC code would use the clock API for some of this, but I
seem to remember there were issues with this (cant recall what right now
and its 2:05 AM).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists