[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d4c7hzr3.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:27:44 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
>> > I have not had this problem since I applied Arjan's (for some reason
>> > repeatedly rejected) patch to change the ioprio of the various writeback
>> > daemons. Under some loads changing to the noop I/O scheduler also seems
>> > to help (as do most of the non default ones)
>>
>> (link would be useful)
>
>
> "Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority"
>
> October 2007 (yes its that old)
One issue discussed back then (also for a similar XFS patch) was
that having the kernel use the RT priorities by default makes
them useless as user override.
The proposal was to have a new priority level between normal and RT
for this, but noone implemented this.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists