[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090324170057.5d09d5f0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:00:57 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network Device Naming mechanism and policy
> If the MAC address isn't a UUID for the device, then *what* is?
MAC is technically per system if desired (eg old Sun boxes) and that is
quite valid by IEE802.3. In that case you need MAC + topology.
If you are running DECnet your system runs on assigned MAC addresses so
you also have to be careful to use the EPROM MAC (if one exists which is
99.9% of the time) + topology.
> Either people want (a) a name assigned to a specific device (which
> implies a UUID like a MAC address stored on that device somewhere
> accessible to the driver at plug/boot time), or they want (b) to assign
> a name to a *position* on the PCI or USB or firewire or whatever bus, or
> they (c) don't care about this at all.
I'd argue the fumdamental problem is that I can do this
ln -s /dev/sda /dev/thebigdiskunderthefridge
but cannot ln -s /dev/eth0 /dev/ethernet/slot0
and the SIOCGIF/SIF BSD style ioctl interface doesn't do pathnames or
file handles of network devices.
Anyone feel up to putting all the network devices into dev space and
fixing the ioctls ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists