[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090324175621.GE31117@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:56:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>,
Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@...css.fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/9] LTTng instrumentation tasklets
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> tasklet entry and exit events.
> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_tasklet_high_entry);
> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_tasklet_high_exit);
> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_tasklet_low_entry);
> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_tasklet_low_exit);
Dunno - tasklets are a legacy mechanism, not sure we want to
instrument them. That some tasklet activity happens will be obvious
from the softirq tracepoints already.
Anyway ... i guess we could do it if it's done via the more complete
TRACE_EVENT() mechanism in the tracing tree.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists