[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090324204719.GA24320@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:47:19 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>,
Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@...css.fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [patch 6/9] LTTng instrumentation - timer
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > the init methods are missing from your patch entirely - and the rest
> > is partially incomplete as well.
> >
> > Instrumentation of the del_timer() variants is missing. For a
> > complete lifetime analysis of timers this cannot be left out.
>
> Look at the debugobjects hooks. They cover the complete timer life
> time already.
>
> Piggypacking tracepoints on those would simplify maintenance and
> reduce the number of extra lines in the code.
makes sense. They dont cover itimers nor hrtimers though.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists