[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090324213416.GA29507@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:34:16 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andrey Panin <pazke@...pac.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/30] disallow SERIAL_8250_PNP with SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:26:53PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:59:47 +0000
> Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:22:03PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > This patch looks very controversial from my POV. Now distro people must decide
> > > > what to enable SERIAL_8250_PNP or SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE. And no matter what you
> > >
> > > They do already, otherwise your machine crashes at boot.
> >
> > We don't. The effect of this patch would be to silently disable 8250_PNP
> > (since we don't build with CONFIG_EMBEDDED) and cause a surprising
> > reduction in hardware support. How long has this been broken for?
>
> Since the conversion to drivers/serial - so years.
So everyone using serial console with 8250_PNP enabled gets a crash on
boot, and has done for years? Really?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists