linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.30 Xen merge plan (what's in xen.git)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49C96728.8070808@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:05:12 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30 Xen merge plan (what's in xen.git)

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>> hpa wanted dom0 changes in some cleaner fashion - he knows the 
>> details. (he'll be back in a few days)
> 
> When I spoke to him last week about this he said he was OK with it.  He 
> didn't make any specific (or even general) objections.  Do you know 
> which subsystem he was referring to?
> 

I was mostly objecting to the apic patches -- I'm okay with the latest 
version, as long as they aren't in hot code (I never got the time to 
measure it.)

Other than that: the x86-touching bits seemed okay, the pure xen code... 
well, it's not my problem.

I'll be back on Saturday.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/