[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090324170559.1667c847@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:05:59 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
David Rees <drees76@...il.com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:03:53 -0700
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
>
> I remember early in the 2.6.x days there was a lot of focus on making
> interactive performance good, and for a long time it was. But this
> I/O problem has been around for a *long* time now... What happened?
> Do not many people run into this daily? Do all the filesystem
> hackers run with special mount options to mitigate the problem?
>
the people that care use my kernel patch on ext3 ;-)
(or the userland equivalent tweak in /etc/rc.local)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists