[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C9EB17.2020408@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:28:07 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
CC: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl4030 VAUX3 supports 3.0V
Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:36 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> Liam Girdwood wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:48 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>>>> On Friday 06 March 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>>> Would it make sense to make this platform data so that if a given board
>>>>> requires running the chip like this it can be enabled for those boards
>>>>> but it's not something people might turn on because it seems useful?
>>>> Let's hear if it's actually needed, first. :)
>>>>
>>>> I coded those tables so that it would be easy to kick in the
>>>> support for out-of-spec operation if it's really needed. But
>>>> so far we don't know that it's needed, and I'd rather it not
>>>> be too easy to run like that.
>>>>
>>> I've now reverted this patch.
>> TI say we can use VAUX3 at 3V and expect no problems:
>>
>> http://community.ti.com/forums/p/3777/14574.aspx
>>
>> So how do we do it?
>
> I'd prefer seeing the reply from Ghandar to David's last question before
> accepting this patch again. It's still not 100% clear from TI, things
> seem a little bit muddled as to whether 3V will be guaranteed to work on
> *all* shipped devices.
Ghandar has responded. What would you like to do?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists