[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090325100746.GI2341@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:07:46 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5][RFC] tracing: move function profiler data out of
function struct
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> +/* Interrupts must be disabled calling this */
> +static struct ftrace_profile *
> +ftrace_profile_alloc(unsigned long ip, bool alloc_safe)
> +{
> + struct ftrace_profile *rec = NULL;
> +
> + /* prevent recursion */
> + if (atomic_inc_return(&__get_cpu_var(ftrace_profile_disable)) != 1)
> + goto out;
> +
> + __raw_spin_lock(&ftrace_profile_rec_lock);
> +
> + /* Try to always keep another page available */
> + if (!profile_pages->next && alloc_safe)
> + profile_pages->next = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
this does not seem to be NMI safe.
This all would be solved much more robustly by the function
attributes hash approach i suggested in the previous mail. If
percpu_alloc() is done for 20,000 functions the memory allocation
overhead is no big deal.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists