lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84a01a8b0903250545n799a8727o1faad60c8eaf372e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:45:01 +0100
From:	nicolas sitbon <nicolas.sitbon@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: epoll_ctl and const correctness

Currently, the prototype of epoll_ctl is :

int epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd, struct epoll_event *event);

I searched in the man of epoll_ctl and google, and it seems that the
structure pointed to by event isn't modify, valgrind confirms this
behaviour, so am I wrong? or the good prototype is

int epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd, struct epoll_event const *event);

Thanks by advance!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ