[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237985832.7972.930.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:57:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] perf_counter: kerneltop: mmap_pages argument
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 13:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 13:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > > Also, when mixing streams (events,mmap) is a single: you missed
> > > > 'n' events still good?
> > >
> > > How would such mixing work? Multiple counters streaming into the
> > > same mmap area?
> >
> > No basically having overflow events and mmap-vma changed events in
> > a single output stream.
>
> ah, and i missed the impact of variable size records - that too
> makes it somewhat impractical to emit overflow records in situ. (the
> kernel does not really know the precise start of the previous
> record, typically.)
Alternatively, we could simply not emit new events until the read
position increases,. that's much simpler.
Still don't like mapping the stuff writable though..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists