lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090325125955.GB516@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:59:55 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akataria@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor


* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 08:50 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > >> I dont really like this one. KVM is a hypervisor too, and so is 
> > >> Xen and lguest. VMware is one of the many types of a 
> > >> hypervisors.
> > > 
> > > Can we use common hypervisor for Xen, lguest, vmware, etc.
> > > And Xen, lguest, vmware will be the sub-options.
> > 
> > Obviously.  We spent a lot of time breaking up the cpu stuff into common
> > and vendor-specific portions, we shouldn't go backwards w.r.t. hypervisors.
> > 	
> 
> OK, agreed.
> 
> But atleast give freedom to users to disable this who are not willing to
> use it.
> 
> Currently hypervisor is used only used by VMWARE, so is I prepare this
> freedom patch:
> 
> From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:40:01 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: Introduce CONFIG_X86_VMWARE option
> 
> Impact: freedom to choose
> 
> Gives freedom to users to select or suppress CONFIG_X86_VMWARE option.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                  |    7 +++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h |    9 +++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile      |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index f5d7d29..56e1a9c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -554,6 +554,13 @@ config HPET_EMULATE_RTC
>  	def_bool y
>  	depends on HPET_TIMER && (RTC=y || RTC=m || RTC_DRV_CMOS=m || RTC_DRV_CMOS=y)
>  
> +config X86_VMWARE
> +	bool
> +	default n
> +	prompt "X86 VMware support"
> +	---help---
> +	 Enable X86 VMware Hypervisor support.
> +
>  # Mark as embedded because too many people got it wrong.
>  # The code disables itself when not needed.
>  config DMI
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h
> index 369f5c5..c08ae75 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hypervisor.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,16 @@
>  #ifndef ASM_X86__HYPERVISOR_H
>  #define ASM_X86__HYPERVISOR_H
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_VMWARE
>  extern unsigned long get_hypervisor_tsc_freq(void);
>  extern void init_hypervisor(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
> +#else
> +static inline unsigned long get_hypervisor_tsc_freq(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void init_hypervisor(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) {}
> +#endif
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index 3efcb2b..24372f7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ endif
>  
>  obj-y			:= intel_cacheinfo.o addon_cpuid_features.o
>  obj-y			+= proc.o capflags.o powerflags.o common.o
> -obj-y			+= vmware.o hypervisor.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32)	+= bugs.o cmpxchg.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64)	+= bugs_64.o
>  
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_VMWARE)		+= vmware.o hypervisor.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG)		+= cpu_debug.o

vmware can be considered a CPU here, so i think making the disabling 
also depend on PROCESSOR_SELECT.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ